I need to start planning to replace the Cisco VPN client in the next year or two.You must choose SSL VPN for remote access, because Cisco says so.Cisco doesn’t like IPSec as a dynamic secure remote access method.Cisco isn’t planning on continuing the Cisco VPN Client.You can choose any technology, so long as it is SSL VPNĪ quick look at Cisco An圜onnect will confirm that this is an SSL VPN technology only. There doesn’t seem to be any End of Life or End of Support notices, so the current version must still be getting support, but there is no future for it. There are no current plans to provide 64-bit support for the Cisco VPN Client but 64-bit support is available for the Cisco An圜onnect VPN Client.” “Cisco VPN Client Version 5 is available for 32-bit Windows Vista. For 圆4 (64-bit) Windows support, you must utilize Cisco’s next-generation Cisco An圜onnect VPN Client.” – Link Here
#Cisco anyconnect vpn cost mac os x#
“The Cisco VPN client supports Windows 2000, XP and Vista (x86/32-bit only) Linux (Intel) Mac OS X 10.4 and Solaris UltraSparc (32 and 64-bit). Is that good for customers ? Or are we being shafted to increase revenue ? The Cisco VPN Client that uses IPSec as a dynamic remote access method to IOS, ASA, PIX and C6500 VPN modules is basically dead. But that costs up to USD$125 per VPN client. Cisco has ceased development on the IPSec VPN client, and shifted to pushing the SSL VPN client for remote VPN access for both IOS and ASA platforms.
0 kommentar(er)
